🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic discussions with the United States on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from mediators to restart discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Complex Course

The foreign minister is walking a difficult course since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and emotionally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been obliterated. Following this, Western states exercised their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Position

Tehran representatives stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in some form if negotiations resume.

The US president last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet getting consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the conference, intended to depict the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of global regulations, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be settled by military means. He said the assaults began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust hard to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently sought to dictate their demands during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be active and stays the primary solution to settle disputes, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they address to the Iranian people with the language of respect and respect, they will receive a reply in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."